| drussell |
09-22-2014 10:36 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieseljeep
(Post 3115686)
I always understood that was the slight differences in numbering codes was the manufacturers practice to differentiate their product, from the other makes.
Didn't all those CRT designs, have to be registered with the RMA or RETMA, at the time?
|
They didn't HAVE to be registered, indeed many specialty tubes were only ever known by their manufacturer's internal number (like a Du Mont 5BP1 was known internally to Du Mont as a 2525A5). Many oscilliscope tubes, for example, never had a registered type designation (ie. the Tektronix T7100 1 GHz scope tube was never registered with the EIA), however, most commercially used tubes manufactured in any significant quantity were registered and received one of the standardized type identifiers.
I really can't say enough good things about this book... :) I have not checked but copies may still be available directly from Mr. Keller at <kellerp4(at)frontier(dot)com>. Quoting once again, this time section 1.10, "CRT and Phosphor Nomenclature", pp. 41-2:
Quote:
Within the United States, receiving tubes, special purpose tubes, cathode-ray tubes and phosphors have been registered to promote standardization since the 1930s under the auspices of the Radio Manufacturers Association (RMA) which was founded in 1924. This trade association later became the Radio-Television Manufacturers Association (RTMA) in 1950, the Radio-Electronics-Television Manufacturers Association (RETMA) in 1953 and finally the Electronic Industries Association (EIA) in 1956.* The engineering council charged with administering the registration system went through its own share of alphabet soup starting at JETEC (Joint Electron Tube Engineering Council), JEDEC (Joint Electron Device Engineering Council) to the current TEPAC (Tube Engineering Panel Advisory Council).
The goal of tube registrations was to ensure common specifications and interchangability between manufacturers. In the early days of radio, one manufacturer's tubes might perform satisfactorily in a given circuit while another's might not, even though both had the same type number.
From about 1934 to 1940 the earliest cathode-ray tube registrations consisted of three and four digit numbers. The RCA 902 through 914 series, 1802 through 1813 series and the Du Mont 2501 through 2533 series were examples of the straight numbering system. Four-digit numbers were also used for some RCA CRTs, such as the type 4490 registered in the 1960s, although the reason for deviating from conventional practice is unclear. An "A" following the numbers indicated an improved version that could replace the original, e.g., type 902-A. From about 1940 until 1982, the tube type numbers were in the form of 5BP1 and 12AP4, where the first number designates the screen size in inches, five and 12 inches, respectively. The first letter is a sequentially assigned identifier to discriminate one tube from another of the same size, for example 5AP1, 5BP1 and 5CP1. This letter was assigned beginning with "A" and progressing through "Z" after which a second letter was added such as 5ABP1. The "P" followed by a one- or two-digit number indicated the phosphor screen type.** Eventually these reached P57 before being superseded by the new Worldwide Type Designation System (WTDS) in 1982.*** As with the earlier numerically designated tubes, a suffix with "A," "B," etc., designated an improved design which would replace the earlier version.
* Secrest, J.D. Electronic Industries Association: The first Fifty Years, EIA, 1974.
** EIA. "Optical Characteristics of Cathode-Ray Tube Screens," JEDEC Publication No. 16, June, 1960.
*** ------. "Optical Characteristics of Cathode-Ray Tubes," TEPAC Publication No. 116-B, November 1987.
|
He then goes on to discuss the specifics of the addition of the "V" in 1966 for viewable size after the FTC ruling and the change to WTDS in 1982 (screen size in centimeters, different phosphor coding, integral yoke option, etc.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieseljeep
(Post 3115686)
BTW,I never ran across, any of those CRT's listed in the text, like the 20" numbers. :scratch2:
|
That's not surprising. The 20s are quite rare as the 21s became the popular size and were manufactured in much greater numbers, hence the reason the SAMs for this TV lists the two 20-inch tubes (presumably they essentially used whatever they could source on the early models) and then the 21-inch version as they became more popular which would have required slight alterations to the faceplate and mounting but otherwise would likely be essentially the same chassis and cabinet.
|