View Single Post
  #6  
Old 05-03-2010, 08:38 PM
wa2ise's Avatar
wa2ise wa2ise is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McVoy View Post
... The selection of FM meant that good audio could be received at signal levels way below what was needed for good video. AM sound would have resulted in sound and picture requiring about the same signal levels for acceptable performance.
... And FM detectors were more complex than AM ones at the time.
That would mean that less transmit power would be needed for the FM sound, to get the same area coverage for it as the video signal would have. Thus less interference to the next higher channel in the next market area. Thus the FCC deciding it was a better choice. The fact that FM would require a little bit more circuitry wasn't that big a deal, as the video part required a large amount of circuitry anyway.
__________________
Reply With Quote