Videokarma.org

Go Back   Videokarma.org TV - Video - Vintage Television & Radio Forums > Early Color Television

Notices

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2006, 12:17 PM
smoker76 smoker76 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 87
6BK4 versus 6BK4A

I thought I read somewhere here that there is a difference.
I guess there must be a difference.
Can someone tell what it is?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2006, 12:18 PM
mhardy6647's Avatar
mhardy6647 mhardy6647 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New England
Posts: 333
Just a wild-guess... perhaps they improved the lead-glass shielding to reduce X-ray emissions from the tube? Color TV x-rays were a big deal sometime in the late-1960's as I recall.
__________________
all the best,
mrh
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2006, 12:45 PM
blue_lateral's Avatar
blue_lateral blue_lateral is offline
...
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 530
I think it was the 6bk4c that had the heavy leaded glass. AFAIK they are all interchangeable, but later tubes are probably more reliable.

John
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2006, 09:10 PM
3Guncolor 3Guncolor is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 312
6EL4's are a great sub for a 6BK4. To be safe I always use one of either 6BK4C/6EL4 who needs extra xrays these days.

In fact during the xray scare days there were stickers we put on the sets that said we changed the tube to the type with the better shielding
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2006, 05:50 AM
smoker76 smoker76 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 87
Thanks guys. I just wonder what actual effects come

to the person recieving that radiation.
I was going to put the original 6BK4 but I guess it would be stupid to do so. I definately do not need any more radiation.
I am guessing it promotes spots of skin cancer maybe even effects on some internal organs like the eyes.
It creeps me out to think my favorite hobby is dangerous. I hope to have kids someday!

If someone has one of those stickers I would love to reproduce it for all of us to use!

Last edited by smoker76; 05-10-2006 at 05:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #6  
Old 05-10-2006, 11:13 AM
kx250rider's Avatar
kx250rider kx250rider is offline
REAL TVs have TUBES!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Dallas
Posts: 3,239
TV X-ray danger... I am a nay-sayer. According to all that I have heard, the X-radiation produced by the high voltage supply in a color TV is harmless, unless you sleep inside the HV box for 1,350 years or something. Same as "drinking diet coke causes cancer". It does, if you drink 80 gallons per hour for 200 years, or something like that. I just love those government scare studies. "all things in moderation"

I would be more worried about RF radiation from cellphones. They say that brain tumors are on the rise, and on the same side of the head usually as where the victim holds a telephone among those who are glued to their phones in all phases of life. RF radiation, or just damaged tissue from hearing hours of "MaryboughtanewvacuumcleanerJoehadanaffairwiththem ailman'swifeinKansas,andOh,Ijustmissedmyfreewayexi tandIranaschoolbusofftheroadWOOPS!gotta-gonow-OhButIforgottosaythatIneedmorevinegarformyfootfung us-canyoupicksomeup?bleep-bleepDroppedcall...." That would give ME a brain tumor, and a pain in the buttocks as well. Glad I am not one of those people!

Enough of that I guess...

How about a 6BD4? Those are kind of rare, and are electrically the same as a 6BK4. Those seem to be in only 1955-57 color sets. They're neat looking, with a larger base than the 6BK/6EL4s. I wonder if those were even less shielded, or if they just weren't as good-working as the later tubes?

Charles

Last edited by Kaye-Halbert TV; 05-10-2006 at 11:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2006, 01:15 PM
blue_lateral's Avatar
blue_lateral blue_lateral is offline
...
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaye-Halbert TV
<snip>

How about a 6BD4? Those are kind of rare, and are electrically the same as a 6BK4. Those seem to be in only 1955-57 color sets. They're neat looking, with a larger base than the 6BK/6EL4s. I wonder if those were even less shielded, or if they just weren't as good-working as the later tubes?

Charles
There is an article on the web somewhere (I cant seem to find at the moment) where experimenters are using 6bk4s as x-ray tubes in homemade x-ray machines. They dont work that well. the guy who wrote the article had a 6bd4, and it worked the best. Apparently the lead shielded 6bk4c is useless in this duty. They run these under completely different conditions than in a television set. I believe the formula was a whole bunch of voltage and a cold cathode.

I think the 6bd4 wont take quite as much current as a 6bk4 or 6bk4c. Since I tend to set the 6bk4 slightly hot, I would prefer a newer tube.

I think that a 6bk4 will only make little (if any) x-radiation unless the set is *broken*. 21.5KV isnt enough HV.

**edit** Found the link. I guess the best x-ray emitter ws a 6en4, not a 6bd4.

http://www.belljar.net/xray.htm

John

Last edited by blue_lateral; 05-11-2006 at 02:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-11-2006, 03:49 PM
bgadow's Avatar
bgadow bgadow is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Federalsburg, MD
Posts: 5,863
I seem to recall hearing that GE had to recall some sets in the late 60s due to defective tubes that emitted too much radiation. After that they seemed to really be on their toes.

I don't ever recall hearing of an epidemic of cancer among tv repairman, which I will take as a good sign!

I have the service manual for an Admiral color tv with a 21AXP22. It says not to operate the set without the safety glass as there will be xrays emitted from the center of the screen. The safety glass was enough to stop them.
__________________
Bryan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-11-2006, 08:52 PM
peverett peverett is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 883
A possible epidemic of cancer for TV repairmen from the 1960s/1970s would be lung cancer. Every one of them that I knew smoked.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-2006, 02:08 AM
kx250rider's Avatar
kx250rider kx250rider is offline
REAL TVs have TUBES!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Dallas
Posts: 3,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by peverett
A possible epidemic of cancer for TV repairmen from the 1960s/1970s would be lung cancer. Every one of them that I knew smoked.
I never thought about it much, but you're right! Only one shop owner I know has never smoked; all others do/did.

But off hand, I can only think of a handfull of TV collectors who smoke Most are nonsmokers (and unmarried)

Charles
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
  #11  
Old 05-10-2006, 12:46 PM
Charlie's Avatar
Charlie Charlie is offline
On Land
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Warren, TX
Posts: 2,582
I've often wondered just how much exposure can have an affect on a person. I'm usually using the 6BK4C/6EL4 and 3A3C... and I've spent plenty of time behind the set with the cage cover off. I feel the same way as Charles... you probably have to spend lots of time cuddled up next to the tube. It would, however, be interesting to have a meter and gauge the amount of x-rays near the back of a set.

I have an interesting tube... looks to be a HV rectifier... a 3DR3. It has a thick lead shield covering the entire tube and it's heavy! I've never seen a set using this tube... I'm assuming it was likely used in the later years... maybe late 60s / early 70s.
__________________
Charlie Trahan


He who dies with the most toys still dies.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-10-2006, 10:06 PM
JCFitz JCFitz is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Willards,MD
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie

I have an interesting tube... looks to be a HV rectifier... a 3DR3. It has a thick lead shield covering the entire tube and it's heavy! I've never seen a set using this tube... I'm assuming it was likely used in the later years... maybe late 60s / early 70s.

They're used in the GE C-2 chassis from the early 70's.The only sets I remember seeing those in.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-11-2006, 12:02 AM
kx250rider's Avatar
kx250rider kx250rider is offline
REAL TVs have TUBES!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles & Dallas
Posts: 3,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCFitz
They're used in the GE C-2 chassis from the early 70's.The only sets I remember seeing those in.
Yes; GE only as far as I know.

Charles
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-11-2006, 12:03 AM
frenchy frenchy is offline
Frenchy
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Moreno Valley CA
Posts: 534
xrays - makes me think of that funny scene on Everybody Loves Raymond when all three male family members are waiting for the microwave to heat something up, so they all place their hands over there you-know-whats : ) Maybe that would help when sitting real close to these tvs too...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-16-2006, 02:01 PM
holmesuser01's Avatar
holmesuser01 holmesuser01 is offline
VideoKarma Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 1,731
There is a book that RCA had back in the early 1970's that explained most receiving tubes in the USA. I have a copy that I bought in 1976 at the beginning of my repair shop venture. It has been invaluable to me over the years. It also lists diagrams for color, and B/W kine's. too.

Check eBay.
Reply With Quote
Audiokarma
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Copyright 2012 VideoKarma.org, All rights reserved.